Intended purpose
Capture what the tool is intended to do, who uses it, and where it influences employment or worker-management workflows.
EU evidence map
Map employment AI evidence before the August 2, 2026 milestone.
US teams with EU candidates, workers, vendors, or customers should know which systems influence employment and worker-management decisions, and which evidence lives with the vendor.
Evidence map
Four records to organize first.
Provider and deployer split
Document whether the organization builds, substantially modifies, imports, distributes, or deploys the system.
Instructions and limits
Collect vendor user instructions, intended-use boundaries, limitations, monitoring expectations, and human oversight guidance.
Buyer questions
Use the map to find missing vendor evidence.
What inputs are used?
Ask which applicant, worker, performance, assessment, or interaction data affects the output.
What should reviewers do?
Ask what human reviewers see, what they can override, and when they should escalate decisions.
How are updates communicated?
Ask how model, scoring, feature, or intended-use changes are disclosed to customers.