AI Hiring Compliance Radar

Impact assessment

Start the AI hiring impact assessment with evidence, not assumptions.

A useful assessment starts by mapping the workflow, decision influence, vendor documentation, affected people, human oversight, and open evidence gaps.

Assessment map

Five facts to organize before deeper review.

1

Workflow and purpose

Describe the role, stage, process owner, intended purpose, and people affected by the AI-assisted workflow.

2

Decision influence

Document whether the tool recommends, ranks, scores, filters, summarizes, or directly changes a person’s outcome.

3

Evidence and controls

Collect vendor limitations, testing summaries, data-use details, human oversight instructions, and monitoring plans.

Escalation triggers

When the starter should become a formal review.

High impact

Employment outcomes

Escalate when AI materially influences selection, rejection, advancement, promotion, discipline, or workforce allocation.

Missing docs

Vendor evidence gaps

Escalate when a vendor cannot provide limitations, testing, intended-use, oversight, or notice support.

Jurisdiction

NYC, Colorado, or EU exposure

Escalate when the workflow touches regulated jurisdictions, remote roles, or customers asking for an evidence file.